[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BDC437.1050701@st.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:36:55 +0100
From: Armando Visconti <armando.visconti@...com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: "kgene.kim@...sung.com" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
"swarren@...dia.com" <swarren@...dia.com>,
"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hsweeten@...ionengravers.com" <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nommu: Enable the strict alignment (CR_A) bit only if
ARCH < v6
On 12/03/2012 06:46 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:25:53PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:44:11PM +0100, Armando Visconti wrote:
>>> On 11/29/2012 12:04 PM, Armando VISCONTI wrote:
>>>> This patch keeps disabled the strict alignment CP15 bit for
>>>> all armv6 and armv7 processor without the mmu. This behaviour
>>>> is now same as in the mmu case.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Armando Visconti<armando.visconti@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S | 2 +-
>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S b/arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S
>>>> index 278cfc1..2c228a0 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.S
>>>> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ __after_proc_init:
>>>> * CP15 system control register value returned in r0 from
>>>> * the CPU init function.
>>>> */
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP
>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP)&& __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__< 6
>>>> orr r0, r0, #CR_A
>>>> #else
>>>> bic r0, r0, #CR_A
>>>
>>> Any feedback on this simple patch?
>>
>> Well, it brings the nommu version into line with the mmu version, so
>> it's sensible. Please put it in the patch system, thanks.
>
Done!
> In which case, I'll definitely dust-off the patches to prevent unaligned
> accesses to strongly-ordered memory because that results in good ol'
> UNPREDICTABLE behaviour.
>
Yes, we definetely need them.
Thx,
Arm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists