[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BDC694.1060509@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:47:00 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
CC: x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap
On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -330,9 +317,9 @@ static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
> pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat,&flags);
> sparse_remove_one_section(zone, ms);
> pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat,&flags);
> - return 0;
> +
> + return ret;
I think we don't need to change this line. :)
Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists