lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121203160647.11ad34d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:06:47 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>
Cc:	jaxboe@...ionio.com, kay.sievers@...y.org, tj@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Restore /proc/partitions to not display
 non-partitionable removable devices

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:56:49 -0800
Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com> wrote:

> We found with newer kernels we started seeing the cdrom device showing
> up in /proc/partitions, but it was not there before. Looking into this I found
> that commit d27769ec... block: add GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN introduces this change
> in behavior. It's not clear to me from the commit's changelog if this change was
> intentional or not. This comment still remains:
> /* Don't show non-partitionable removeable devices or empty devices */
> so I've decided to send a patch to restore the behavior of not printing
> unpartitionable removable devices.

d27769ec was merged in August 2011, so I after all this time, your fix
could be viewed as "changing existing behaviour".

So perhaps it would be best to leave things alone.  Is there any
particular problem with the post-Aug, 2011 behaviour?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ