[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87boe9c11b.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:03:28 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf diff: Use internal rb tree for compute resort
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:45:44 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:44:25PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
>>
>> There's no reason to run hists_compute_resort() using output tree.
>> Convert it to use internal tree so that it can remove unnecessary
>> _output_resort. Also move position computation below the resort since
>> it changes the output ordering.
>
> Have you tested this with 'perf top'? With the highest frequency?
After testing 'perf top -F 100000' couple of minutes, I couldn't find
any visible problem. Basically this patchset changes hists__link/match
path which only called from 'perf diff' - I'm working on making use of
that for event group report though. So I didn't check perf top side
seriously. Any reason do you mention it that I'm missing?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists