[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121204155739.GG3885@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:57:39 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xiaotian Feng <dannyfeng@...cent.com>,
Neela Syam Kolli <megaraidlinux@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] megaraid: fix use of delayed work
Hello, again, Xiaotian.
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:39:39AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Urgh... what the.... Didn't see that one coming. I'm gonna push this
> to Linus through the workqueue tree.
>
> Thanks for the fix.
It seems like megaraid doesn't have any reason to use delayed_work at
all. It can use a plain work and cancel_work_sync() instead. Maybe
it was doing the container_of() thing because workqueue didn't use to
have cancel_work_sync()? Anyways, please convert it to use plain
work_struct post 3.7.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists