[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pq2owvf9.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:11:22 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Ravishankar N <ravi.n1@...sung.com>,
Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] fat: restructure export_operations
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
>> I can understand what is doing. I'm asking why there is difference.
>>
>> 1) generic_fh_to_dentry() allows (*_PARENT && fh_len == 2).
>> 2) fat_fh_to_dentry_nostale() doesn't allows (*_PARENT && fh_len == 3).
>>
>> Why does logic has difference?
>
> When we consider the generic routine of encode_fh() and the structure ‘fid’
>
> struct fid {
> struct {
> u32 ino;
> u32 gen;
> u32 parent_ino;
> u32 parent_gen;
> } i32;
> };
>
> fh_len= 2(without parent)
> fh_len=4(with parent)
>
> Condition checking in export_encode_fh()
> {
>
> if (parent && (len < 4)) {
> *max_len = 4;
> return FILEID_INVALID;
> } else if (len < 2) {
> *max_len = 2;
> return FILEID_INVALID;
> }
> ...
> len = 2;
> ...
> if (parent) {
> ..
> len = 4;
> type = FILEID_INO32_GEN_PARENT;
> }
> …
> }
>
> The logic does take care of altering the length for the ‘2’ cases
> with/without parent.
> So, while encoding -> the care has been taken for length checking but
> while decoding(generic_fh_to_dentry) the length check is not put in
> place.
> I think it should be done in the generic routine also.
>
> It should be:
> if ((fh_len != 2 && fh_len != 4) ||
> (fh_type != FILEID_INO32_GEN && fh_type !=
> FILEID_INO32_GEN_PARENT))
> return NULL;
>
> Please share your opinion.
I know encode_fh(). But NFS is network protocol, and network can input
any data, and I guess the userland interface (open_by_handle()?) can be
any too.
And generic_fh_to_dentry()'s input verify choose to check the minimum
length only. But your logic choose the exact length.
I think the both is sane and correct. But I wonder why did you changed it.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists