lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzgP29WfB1yvnj+Q9-TsbX+b-TCCjTS_vPJ16DxMy6aDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Dec 2012 07:45:39 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate UAPI

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de> wrote:
>
> Linus, while I am interested in an answer I think that Dave and Christoph
> as Linux filesystem developers actually deserve one (instead of silently
> being ignored which is also a decision in this matter).
>
> I did not see an answer in linux-2.6 commit log as of today so far.

Christ guys. This whole thread is retarded.

The *ONLY* reason people seem to have for reverting that is a "ooh, my
feelings are hurt by how this was done, and now I'm a pissy bitch and
I want to get this reverted".

Stop the f*cking around already.

If you want something reverted, you show me the *technical* reason for
it. Not the "ooh, I'm so annoyed by how this was done" reason for it.

And if your little feelings got hurt, get your mommy to tuck you in,
don't email me about it. Because I'm not exactly known for my deep
emotional understanding and supportive personality, am I?

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ