[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121205014823.GA28474@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:48:25 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Kevin Liu <keyuan.liu@...il.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci: check voltage range only on regulators
aware of voltage value
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:50:03PM +0800, Kevin Liu wrote:
> 2012/12/4 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>:
> > + if (host->vmmc && regulator_get_voltage(host->vmmc) > 0) {
> > ret = regulator_is_supported_voltage(host->vmmc, 2700000,
> > 3600000);
> > if ((ret <= 0) || (!(caps[0] & SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330)))
> Good idea. But how about the regulator is disabled at this point? So I
> suggest to change to
> if (host->vmmc && regulator_get_voltage(host->vmmc) >= 0)
I'd not expect regulator_get_voltage() to return 0 for disabled
regulators, I'd expect it to return the voltage the regulator will have
when enabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists