[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWUEs2v89Lh6_3HciCQ_tfD-iCNYRDR3wJNcJ=qHqMCYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:04:38 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Look Ma, da kernel is b0rken
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> when we added W=, we thought that one use case would be for devs to
> use it when build-testing patches and check whether they're adding new
> warnings.
>
> However, (1) we need additional functionality in some script to be able
> to test when the build log adds new warnings
>
> and
>
> (2) need someone to enforce it.
>
> I think Geert is doing something like that but I'm not sure he's even
> using W=.
I'm using whatever build output is generated by the linux-next build service.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists