linux-kernel - Re: [3.6 regression?] THP + migration/compaction livelock (I think)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:23:20 -0800
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Marc Duponcheel <marc@...line.be>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [3.6 regression?] THP + migration/compaction livelock (I think)

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Marc Duponcheel wrote:
>
>> # echo always >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
>> # while [ 1 ]
>>   do
>>    sleep 10
>>    date
>>    echo = vmstat
>>    egrep "(thp|compact)" /proc/vmstat
>>    echo = khugepaged stack
>>    cat /proc/501/stack
>>  done > /tmp/49361.xxxx
>> # emerge icedtea
>> (where 501 = pidof khugepaged)
>>
>> for xxxx = base = 3.6.6
>> and xxxx = test = 3.6.6 + diff you provided
>>
>> I attach
>>  /tmp/49361.base.gz
>> and
>>  /tmp/49361.test.gz
>>
>> Note:
>>
>>  with xxx=base, I could see
>>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S  %CPU %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
>>  8617 root      20   0 3620m  41m  10m S 988.3  0.5   6:19.06 javac
>>     1 root      20   0  4208  588  556 S   0.0  0.0   0:03.25 init
>>  already during configure and I needed to kill -9 javac
>>
>>  with xxx=test, I could see
>>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S  %CPU %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
>> 9275 root      20   0 2067m 474m  10m S 304.2  5.9   0:32.81 javac
>>  710 root       0 -20     0    0    0 S   0.3  0.0   0:01.07 kworker/0:1H
>>  later when processing >700 java files
>>
>> Also note that with xxx=test compact_blocks_moved stays 0
>>
>
> Sounds good!  Andy, have you had the opportunity to try to reproduce your
> issue with the backports that Mel listed?  I think he'll be considering
> asking for some of these to be backported for a future stable release so
> any input you can provide would certainly be helpful.

I've had an impressive amount of trouble even reproducing it on 3.6.
Apparently I haven't hid the magic combination yet.  I'll give it
another try soon.

-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/