[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BFC8C9.5070504@antcom.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 23:20:57 +0100
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
CC: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, w.sang@...gutronix.de,
jbe@...gutronix.de, plagnioj@...osoft.com, highguy@...il.com,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, daniel-gl@....net,
rmallon@...il.com, tru@...k-microwave.de, sr@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6 v9] gpio: Add userland device interface to block GPIO
Hi Wolfgang,
On 05/12/12 20:01, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> + for (i = 0; i < block->ngpio; i++) {
>> + status = gpio_request(block->gpio[i], "gpioblock dev");
>
> You could use the name of the GPIO block.
OK.
>> + if (status)
>> + goto err1;
>> +
>> + irq = gpio_to_irq(block->gpio[i]);
>> + if (irq >= 0 &&
>> + !test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &gpio_desc[block->gpio[i]].flags) &&
>> + !gpio_block_is_irq_duplicate(block, i)) {
>> + status = request_irq(irq, gpio_block_irq_handler,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
>> + block->name, block);
>> + if (status)
>> + goto err2;
>> +
>> + block->irq_controlled = true;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> There is no need to request IRQs if "O_NONBLOCK" is specified.
Sure? Regarding this, I found: "The poll() function shall not be
affected by the O_NONBLOCK flag." [1]
> I observed that the read returns once immediately (without blocking)
> after reboot. I did not look into that yet.
Didn't happen to me. Can you tell how this can be reproduced?
Thanks,
Roland
[1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/poll.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists