[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BEFC52.8030902@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:48:34 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Linux-NFS <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: connect to UNIX sockets synchronously
04.12.2012 18:20, Eric Paris пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Stanislav Kinsbursky
> <skinsbursky@...allels.com> wrote:
>
>> But there should be noted, that such implementation introduces limitation
>> (Trond's quote):
>> "That approach can fall afoul of the selinux restrictions on the process
>> context. Processes that are allowed to write data, may not be allowed to
>> create sockets or call connect(). That is the main reason for doing it
>> in the rpciod context, which is a clean kernel process context."
>
> So you tested this and Trond was wrong? This work just fine even on
> an SELinux box? Or it does break tons and tons of people's computers?
>
> -Eric
>
You can read discussion here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1565111/
We use AF_LOCAL transports only for portmapper calls.
So, we decided (or at least I understood that so) to make such connections
from process context - i.e. synchronously.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists