[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201212061024.41760.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:24:41 +0100
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate UAPI
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> > That being said, you'll note that unlike Dave, I have
> > **not** thrown a hissy fit when btrfs grabbed bits from the inode
> > field, even though quite a bit more bits allocated for the inode
> > flags than the fallocate flags.
>
> IOWs, pointing out that the standard peer review process has been
> bypassed is "throwing a hissy fit"? And Linus calls it "being a
> pissy bitch". To me this is acknoweldgement of the fact that
> something wrong was done, but the actors can't bring themselves to
> directly admit it and so are resorting to name calling and
> blame-shifting to discredit the messenger and therefore the message.
+1
Anyway, the decision seems to be set, so indeed waste of energy to discuss
it further.
I agree the process is usually fluid. Cause I did not recognize a thread
like this every day here on this list. And what happened, happened.
But for the future I´d like that patches are posted.
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists