lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212061322060.2701@ionos> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:23:40 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@...ble.net> cc: "Wang, Warner" <warner.wang@...com>, "Wang, Song-Bo (Stoney)" <song-bo.wang@...com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: need help on a DEADLOCK problem related to function try_one_irq() Ed, On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Edward Donovan wrote: > So, let me try to confirm some things now, so I can learn as I go. To > spell out what's in the new patch: > > The later line, > > action = desc->action; > > should have been this all along? > > action = action->next; Yes. My bad :( > And with that fixed, the other test can go. Which is good, now, > because it was creating locking problems for you. > > Ok, thanks for bearing with me. I'll repeat the test here, some > more, but they've generally behaved consistently and probably will > keep showing the same. > > I might as well add that I would happily ship one of these computers, > with a reliably spurious interrupt, to Thomas in Germany. if that > would help for testing. I'm always happy to have machines which expose strange symptoms. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists