[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212061322060.2701@ionos>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:23:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@...ble.net>
cc: "Wang, Warner" <warner.wang@...com>,
"Wang, Song-Bo (Stoney)" <song-bo.wang@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: need help on a DEADLOCK problem related to function
try_one_irq()
Ed,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Edward Donovan wrote:
> So, let me try to confirm some things now, so I can learn as I go. To
> spell out what's in the new patch:
>
> The later line,
>
> action = desc->action;
>
> should have been this all along?
>
> action = action->next;
Yes. My bad :(
> And with that fixed, the other test can go. Which is good, now,
> because it was creating locking problems for you.
>
> Ok, thanks for bearing with me. I'll repeat the test here, some
> more, but they've generally behaved consistently and probably will
> keep showing the same.
>
> I might as well add that I would happily ship one of these computers,
> with a reliably spurious interrupt, to Thomas in Germany. if that
> would help for testing.
I'm always happy to have machines which expose strange symptoms.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists