[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpon3uW2N3Kaj_HkjVsUZ0+9oOHtPev=okyP50BxSKz7ntQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:17:21 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spear-devel@...t.st.com,
Vipul Kumar Samar <vipulkumar.samar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] mfd: stmpe: Update DT support for stmpe driver
On 6 December 2012 22:10, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> + pdata->id = -1;
>
> Perhaps PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO would be better?
Why do we want to allocate device id's for it? Multiple devices
are already distinguished and so -1 would be better.
>> + pdata->irq_trigger = IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE;
>> +
>
> There's no need for this. It's guaranteed to be zero by:
>
> pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
I kept it so that in future others don't think that we missed handling
of irq_trigger for DT case.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists