[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hw1Zq+nUG5CXe+7sGNa_1A3YGpe-TBbSTeaPtzXWD57hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:50:05 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: npiggin@...nel.dk, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] sched: select_task_rq_fair clean up
2012/12/3 Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>:
> It is impossible to miss a task allowed cpu in a eligible group.
>
> And since find_idlest_group only return a different group which
> excludes old cpu, it's also imporissible to find a new cpu same as old
> cpu.
Is it possible for weighted_cpuload() to return ULONG_MAX? If so,
find_idlest_cpu() can return -1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists