lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121206181452.GA14700@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:14:52 -0800 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Subject: Re: [ 67/89] drm/radeon: properly track the crtc not_enabled case evergreen_mc_stop() On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:35:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Deucher, Alexander > <Alexander.Deucher@....com> wrote: > >> > The original patches should go into 3.6 kernels as well: > >> > > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=4 > >> a15903db02026728d0cf2755c6fabae16b8db6a > >> > > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=6 > >> 2444b7462a2b98bc78d68736c03a7c4e66ba7e2 > >> > > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=8 > >> 04cc4a0ad3a896ca295f771a28c6eb36ced7903 > >> > > >> > I've been meaning to follow up on it, but I haven't had the time. Do I need > >> to send explicit patches to stable@...r or can I just ask the above commits > >> be cherrypicked to 3.6? > >> > > >> > >> Normally the CC tag works. Not entirely sure why it didn't for the one > >> patch I asked about. The other two commits you've highlighted here are > >> lacking any sort of stable tag, so you'd have to pipe up here about them. > > > > The patches were not initially a bug fix per se, so I didn't cc stable. It was only later that I got reports of the patches fixing issues for some people. Normally I add the stable cc if the patch is a bug fix. > > > >> > >> I went ahead and tried the cherry-pick myself on top of 3.6.9, in the > >> order you specified above. The 62444b7462a has a trivial conflict coming > >> back. I've attached an mbox with these three patches. If you want to > >> give them a glance over and OK them, that would be great. > > > > They look good to me. Thanks! > > > > Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com> > > Thanks Alex. > > We've had a couple of users successfully test a kernel with these 3 > patches applied for rhbz 855275. > > Greg, is the mbox enough or would you like me to send them separately > to the list? No need, I've used the mbox's patches, thanks. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists