[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADApbej+f9P1sgLMR8_McoCCSLDjJt_qitWdNd8X1v6PwZqsnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:52:03 +0800
From: Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com>
To: mturquette@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, haojian.zhuang@...il.com
Subject: common clock framwork: clk_set_rate issue
hi
When develop the clk drivers for SOCs based on common clock framework.
I met a issue.
For example there is a uart device, it's function clock comes from a
divider, and the divider's parent is a mux. It means
MUX --> DIV --> UART
As we know that UART can work at low baudrate for a terminal, while it
can also connect to GPS module which needs a high rate. So the MUX
will provide two clock source, a low clock rate and high clock rate.
The MUX clk driver clk-mux.c does not implement a ->round_rate callbacks.
It means that when uart driver is used for a GPS and it want to change
it clock, the driver will call clk_set_rate(); clk_set_rate will loop
upward to DIV, and DIV will try to set its divider, and it need loop
upward to MUX.
In fact the current clk drivers have some issue.
MUX clk driver should provide the round_rate callback, it then can
provide a new_rate. It means that in clk_calc_subtree MUX can switch
the clock source.
So in the uart driver we can depends on the configuration passed by
device tree to initiaze the clock for different purpose. This driver
may be shared by many SOCs, so it does not care the clock framework.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists