lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CADApbej+f9P1sgLMR8_McoCCSLDjJt_qitWdNd8X1v6PwZqsnQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:52:03 +0800 From: Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com> To: mturquette@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, haojian.zhuang@...il.com Subject: common clock framwork: clk_set_rate issue hi When develop the clk drivers for SOCs based on common clock framework. I met a issue. For example there is a uart device, it's function clock comes from a divider, and the divider's parent is a mux. It means MUX --> DIV --> UART As we know that UART can work at low baudrate for a terminal, while it can also connect to GPS module which needs a high rate. So the MUX will provide two clock source, a low clock rate and high clock rate. The MUX clk driver clk-mux.c does not implement a ->round_rate callbacks. It means that when uart driver is used for a GPS and it want to change it clock, the driver will call clk_set_rate(); clk_set_rate will loop upward to DIV, and DIV will try to set its divider, and it need loop upward to MUX. In fact the current clk drivers have some issue. MUX clk driver should provide the round_rate callback, it then can provide a new_rate. It means that in clk_calc_subtree MUX can switch the clock source. So in the uart driver we can depends on the configuration passed by device tree to initiaze the clock for different purpose. This driver may be shared by many SOCs, so it does not care the clock framework. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists