linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix initializer entry defined twice issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121207000511.GD2510@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:05:12 +0000
From:	Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>
To:	Patrick Trantham <patrick.trantham@...l7.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Otavio Salvador <otavio@...ystems.com.br>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix initializer entry defined twice issue

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 05:59:21PM -0600, Patrick Trantham wrote:
> On 12/06/2012 05:16 PM, Cong Ding wrote:
> >the ".config_intr" is defined twice in both line 208 and 212.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/net/phy/smsc.c |    1 -
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> >index 16dceed..5cee6bd 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
> >@@ -205,7 +205,6 @@ static struct phy_driver smsc_phy_driver[] = {
> >  	/* basic functions */
> >  	.config_aneg	= genphy_config_aneg,
> >  	.read_status	= lan87xx_read_status,
> >-	.config_intr	= smsc_phy_config_intr,
> >  	/* IRQ related */
> >  	.ack_interrupt	= smsc_phy_ack_interrupt,
> 
> Hi Cong,
> 
> That looks like a mistake from my previous patch to that file.  Copy
> and paste fail.
> 
> The line should read:
> .config_init    = smsc_phy_config_init,
> 
> I can submit a patch once I get off work unless you beat me to it.
Thanks for the note. It's better that you submit a patch together with your
code.

- cong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/