[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121207090135.GC31938@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:01:35 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 3/6] memcg: rework mem_cgroup_iter to use cgroup
iterators
On Thu 06-12-12 19:39:41, Ying Han wrote:
[...]
> Michal,
>
> I got some trouble while running this patch with my test. The test
> creates hundreds of memcgs which each runs some workload to generate
> global pressure. At the last, it removes all the memcgs by rmdir. Then
> the cmd "ls /dev/cgroup/memory/" hangs afterwards.
>
> I studied a bit of the patch, but not spending too much time on it
> yet. Looks like that the v2 has something different from your last
> post, where you replaces the mem_cgroup_get() with css_get() on the
> iter->last_visited. Didn't follow why we made that change, but after
> restoring the behavior a bit seems passed my test.
Hmm, strange. css reference counting should be stronger than mem_cgroup
one because it pins css thus cgroup which in turn keeps memcg alive.
> Here is the patch I applied on top of this one:
[...]
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists