linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50C1D758.1080007@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date:	Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:47:36 +0100
From:	"Jan H. Schönherr" 
	<schnhrr@...tu-berlin.de>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] printk() fixes, optimizations, and clean ups

Am 07.12.2012 03:51, schrieb Joe Perches:
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:37:30 -0800
>> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>>> Can you please pick this up for -next now and I'll
>>> redo my patches against -next for -rc1 so I'm not
>>> delayed until 3.9?
>>
>> It would be better to do things in the other order.
>>
>> a) Your patches perform mainly code-movement which doesn't cause
>>    functional changes.  Jan's patches are functional changes which
>>    require more thought and testing and possible fixups.
> 
> Fine by me.  Jan?

No problem.

I agree with Andrew, that patches 9 to 14 could use indeed some
more eyeballs.

Patches 1 to 8 are more straight-forward, and I would consider
these ready. However, they are also those, where I probably won't
have any trouble rebasing them on top of your changes.


Anyway. Until now I always thought my patches will end up in the
queue of some maintainer, so that I don't have to bother about
_when_ posting my patches. Therefore: when should I repost a
version rebased on top of Joe's changes?

(If I'd get some opinions on 9 to 14 until then, all the better.)

Regards
Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/