[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4PDmL-1U6SVFohS_du-7uJngbR-4EBa4UUSWa-xs66Lmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 22:40:10 +0900
From: JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] mm, vmalloc: change iterating a vmlist to find_vm_area()
Hello, Pekka.
2012/12/7 Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com> wrote:
>> The purpose of iterating a vmlist is finding vm area with specific
>> virtual address. find_vm_area() is provided for this purpose
>> and more efficient, because it uses a rbtree.
>> So change it.
>
> You no longer take the 'vmlist_lock'. This is safe, because...?
As Bob mentioned, find_vm_area() hold a 'vmap_area_lock' during
searching a area.
When we hold a 'vmap_area_lock', area can't be removed.
So this change is safe.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists