[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212071013200.30243@morpheus.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:24:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, shemminger@...tta.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
gospo@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry@...adcom.com,
saeed.bishara@...il.com,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded
encapsulation
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 08:45 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On 12/07/2012 02:07 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 17:56 -0800, Joseph Gasparakis wrote:
> > >> This patch adds support in the kernel for offloading in the NIC Tx and Rx
> > >> checksumming for encapsulated packets (such as VXLAN and IP GRE).
> > > [...]
> > >> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > >> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > >> @@ -1063,6 +1063,8 @@ struct net_device {
> > >> netdev_features_t wanted_features;
> > >> /* mask of features inheritable by VLAN devices */
> > >> netdev_features_t vlan_features;
> > >> + /* mask of features inherited by encapsulating devices */
> > >> + netdev_features_t hw_enc_features;
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > How will the networking core know *which* encapsulations this applies
> > > to? I notice that your implementation in ixgbe does not set
> > > NETIF_F_HW_CSUM here, so presumably the hardware will parse headers to
> > > find which ranges should be checksummed and it won't cover the next
> > > encapsulation protocol that comes along.
> > >
> > > Ben.
> > >
> >
> > Actually the offload is generic to any encapsulation that does not
> > compute a checksum on the inner headers. So as long as you can treat
> > the outer headers as one giant L2 header you can pretty much ignore what
> > is in there as long as the inner network and transport header values are
> > set. There are a number of tunnels that fall into that category since
> > most just use IP as the L2 and the L3 usually doesn't contain any checksum.
>
> Yes, that should work, but it requires that the driver/hardware uses the
> header offsets from the skb rather than parsing the packet. This is not
> currently required for devices with the NETIF_F_IP_CSUM and
> NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM features.
>
> Please do state explicitly which feature flags are valid in
> hw_enc_features, any changes in semantics, and in particular in what
> cases the driver/hardware is supposed to use header offsets from the skb
> vs parsing the packet.
>
> Ben.
>
So the idea here is that the driver will use the headers for checksumming
if the skb->encapsulation bit is on. The bit should be set in the protocol
driver.
To answer the second comment, the flags that we use in this series of
patches is NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM and NETIF_F_SG. These are
the bits that we propose will be used for checksumming of encapsulation.
As per a previous comment in v2, the hw_enc_features field should be used
also in the future when NICs have more encap offloads, so one could
indicate these features there from the driver.
Furthermore, I submitted a patch for Rx checksumming, where NETIF_F_RXCSUM
is used, again in conjunction with skb->encapsulation flag. As I mention
in my logs, the driver is expected to set the ip_summed to UNNECESSARY and
turn the skb->encapsulation on, to indicate that the inner headers are
already HW checksummed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists