linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/10] kvm: Check userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1354905128.3224.98.camel@bling.home>
Date:	Fri, 07 Dec 2012 11:32:08 -0700
From:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	mtosatti@...hat.com, gleb@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] kvm: Check userspace_addr when modifying a memory
 slot

On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 13:17 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:20:37PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > The API documents that only flags and guest physical memory space can
> > be modified on an existing slot, but we don't enforce that the
> > userspace address cannot be modified.  Instead we just ignore it.
> > This means that a user may think they've successfully moved both the
> > guest and user addresses, when in fact only the guest address changed.
> > Check and error instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |    8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index e426704..93213e1 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -779,13 +779,19 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  
> >  	r = -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > -	/* Allocate if a slot is being created */
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Allocate if a slot is being created.  If modifying a slot,
> > +	 * the userspace_addr cannot change.
> > +	 */
> >  	if (!old.npages) {
> >  		new.user_alloc = user_alloc;
> >  		new.userspace_addr = mem->userspace_addr;
> >  
> >  		if (kvm_arch_create_memslot(&new, npages))
> >  			goto out_free;
> > +	} else if (mem->userspace_addr != old.userspace_addr) {
> > +		r = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto out_free;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Allocate page dirty bitmap if needed */
> > 
> 
> hmmm...does this mean that on a 'destroy', where npages is 0, the user
> has to set up userspace_addr correctly? If so, that would appear to be
> an unwanted change in semantics here.

Good point, it does change that.  We could make this be (npages &&
mem->userspace_addr != old.userspace_addr) to avoid that case.  Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/