[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121207.145239.1408511750725975741.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:52:39 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joseph.gasparakis@...el.com
Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
shemminger@...tta.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org, gospo@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmitry@...adcom.com, saeed.bishara@...il.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded
encapsulation
From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:52:43 -0800 (PST)
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:41:46 -0800 (PST)
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, David Miller wrote:
>> >
>> >> From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
>> >> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:24:17 -0800 (PST)
>> >>
>> >> > So the idea here is that the driver will use the headers for checksumming
>> >> > if the skb->encapsulation bit is on. The bit should be set in the protocol
>> >> > driver.
>> >> >
>> >> > To answer the second comment, the flags that we use in this series of
>> >> > patches is NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM and NETIF_F_SG. These are
>> >> > the bits that we propose will be used for checksumming of encapsulation.
>> >> > As per a previous comment in v2, the hw_enc_features field should be used
>> >> > also in the future when NICs have more encap offloads, so one could
>> >> > indicate these features there from the driver.
>> >> >
>> >> > Furthermore, I submitted a patch for Rx checksumming, where NETIF_F_RXCSUM
>> >> > is used, again in conjunction with skb->encapsulation flag. As I mention
>> >> > in my logs, the driver is expected to set the ip_summed to UNNECESSARY and
>> >> > turn the skb->encapsulation on, to indicate that the inner headers are
>> >> > already HW checksummed.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> This is the kind of language that belongs in the commit message and
>> >> code comments.
>> >>
>> > Sure. I'll wait to gather some more feedback if there is any and I will
>> > re-spin this off adding more code comments and clarify this in the logs.
>>
>> Great.
>>
>> Please note that this request applies to your receive side change too.
>>
> I believe the logs are sufficient in the rx patch:
>
> This patch adds capability in vxlan to identify received
> checksummed inner packets and signal them to the upper layers of
> the stack. The driver needs to set the skb->encapsulation bit
> and also set the skb->ip_summed to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
>
> ...but I can add more comments to the code if this is what you are
> referring to.
Yes, please do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists