[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50C135EA.2030308@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:18:50 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
wujianguo <wujianguo106@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rob@...dley.net, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, linfeng@...fujitsu.com, jiang.liu@...wei.com,
yinghai@...nel.org, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
minchan.kim@...il.com, mgorman@...e.de, rientjes@...gle.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
wujianguo@...wei.com, qiuxishi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] page_alloc: Bootmem limit with movablecore_map
On 12/07/2012 01:41 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/06/2012 09:28 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Hi hpa and Tang,
>> How do you think about the attached patches, which reserves memory
>> for hotplug from memblock/bootmem allocator at early booting stages?
>
> I don't see any attached patches?
>
> -hpa
>
Sorry, I was a little sleepy and missed the attachment.
View attachment "0001-memblock-introduce-interfaces-to-assoicate-tag-and-d.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (5499 bytes)
View attachment "0002-x86-memhotplug-reserve-memory-from-bootmem-allocator.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (6076 bytes)
View attachment "0003-CMA-use-new-memblock-interfaces-to-simplify-implemen.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3923 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists