[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1212081643590.1984@hadrien>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 16:52:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: plagnioj@...osoft.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: question about drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
The function at91_dt_node_to_map in drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
contains the following code:
new_map = devm_kzalloc(pctldev->dev, sizeof(*new_map) * map_num, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_map)
return -ENOMEM;
*map = new_map;
*num_maps = map_num;
/* create mux map */
parent = of_get_parent(np);
if (!parent) {
kfree(new_map);
return -EINVAL;
}
This is clearly not correct, because the combination of devm_kzalloc and
kfree risks creating a double free. But I am not sure how best to fix it.
Is the data structure intended to normally exist until the driver's remove
function is called? If so, perhaps the devm_kzalloc is OK. If I just
remove the kfree, then the structure will persist until the remove
function is called, even though there was an error, which is perhaps not
good. So I could change the kfree to devm_kfree?
thanks,
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists