[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354988739.3198.3.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:45:39 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
Cc: mmarek@...e.cz, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr, Gilles.Muller@...6.fr,
nicolas.palix@...g.fr, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci: Add unneeded
semicolon test
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 15:34 -0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> This semantic patch looks for semicolons that can be removed without
> changing the semantics of the code. The confidence is moderate
> because there are some false positives on cases like:
>
> b/drivers/mmc/host/cb710-mmc.c:589
> break;
> case MMC_POWER_UP:
> default:
> - /* ignore */;
> }
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci
[]
> +@r1@
> +statement S;
> +position p1;
> +position p != {r_default.p, r_case.p};
> +identifier label;
> +@@
> +(
> +label:;
> +|
> +S@p1;@p
> +)
> +
I believe this also fails on this case:
void some_func(...)
{
...
if (foo)
goto exit;
...
exit:
;
}
where gcc needs a semicolon after a label before a function exit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists