linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] HID: autodetect HID sensor hubs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50C47811.7010503@ahsoftware.de>
Date:	Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:37:53 +0100
From:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] HID: autodetect HID sensor hubs.

Am 09.12.2012 02:12, schrieb Alexander Holler:
> It should not be necessary to add IDs for HID sensor hubs to lists
> in hid-core.c and hid-sensor-hub.c. So instead of a whitelist,
> autodetect such sensor hubs, based on a collection of type
> physical inside a useage page of type sensor. If some sensor hubs
> stil must be usable as raw devices, a blacklist might be created.

That patch didn't check if the device is a USB device and therfor
blutooth hid sensor hubs wouldn't still be handled as raw devices.

I send another patch 1/2 which checks the bus too.
Patch 2/2 still should be applied.

Regards,

Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/