[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1355129761-8088-4-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:55:52 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] regulator: gpio-regulator: Fix logical error in for() loop
The cond-statement of this particular for() loop will always be
true as long as at least one voltage-shifting GPIO is present.
If it wasn't for the break below, we'd be stuck in a forever loop.
This patch inserts the correct cond-statement into the statement.
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
---
drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c
index 3afa46a..5462c28 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ of_get_gpio_regulator_config(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
if (!config->gpios)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- for (i = 0; config->nr_gpios; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < config->nr_gpios; i++) {
gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpios", i);
if (gpio < 0)
break;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists