[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYe1YbeyxC0OWqAY_MFq6oXVLzr0+s50O7X0LZducL4rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:21:11 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] gpio: Provide the STMPE GPIO driver with its own
IRQ Domain
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> Author: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Date: Fri Nov 23 12:36:23 2012 +0000
>
> gpio: Provide the STMPE GPIO driver with its own IRQ Domain
>
> The STMPE GPIO driver can be used as an IRQ controller by some
What is this funny citing and indentation business here... I stripped
all the whitespace by hand, no big deal, just curious.
Looks like you e.g. copy/pasted from a "git log" command log rather
than from an actual patch.
> related devices. Here we provide it with its very own IRQ Domain
> so that IRQs can be issued dynamically. This will stand the
> driver in good stead when it is enabled for Device Tree, as this
> it a prerequisite.
>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Applied.
I apply this late because not using an irqdomain when we can is
an abomination so I'm taking the risk.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists