linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/12] regulator: gpio-regulator: Fix logical error in for() loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121210141251.GD6103@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:12:52 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] regulator: gpio-regulator: Fix logical error in
 for() loop

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:55:52AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> The cond-statement of this particular for() loop will always be
> true as long as at least one voltage-shifting GPIO is present.
> If it wasn't for the break below, we'd be stuck in a forever loop.
> This patch inserts the correct cond-statement into the statement.

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/