lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:18:03 +0800
From:	yanchao wu <1446206@...il.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: How about changing block size to fast huge memory init of sysfs

Hi Hanse,

               I am reading the drive/base/memory.c that you the
maintainer of it. I met a

problem, could you help me with it?

                My panic is following:  BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck
for 22s! [swapper:1]

. This is a warning from watch dog .  My platform is 4tb memory ,
64bit x86, SLES sp2

3.0.13 kernel.

In the beginning, I found that a unnecessary search method named
“find_ memory_block”

then  removed( similar with one commit I found later). It reduced time
from 50s to30s.

Unluckily ,still show the panic.   I think the most expensive cost is
register process.

Because in 4TB  64bit, there are about 320000 block to register.   If
we can reduce the

block number, then the time cost will be smaller. So my another
propose is to make block

size bigger,  then sections_per_block will bigger, then more sections
belong to one block ,

then less block to register ,then less time will cost.

               Is my propose suitable? If  yes, how to change the block size.





Best regards,

Yanchao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists