lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121210142914.GP2516@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:29:14 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"dipankar@...ibm.com" <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/2][RFC] let RCU stall messages escape with
 CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:52:21PM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> 
> The printk()s in RCU stall warnings do not get flushed to the console
> on ARM.  Add the oops_in_progress flag back into the special trylock case in
> console_trylock_for_printk(), and set the flag using "bust_spinlocks(1)".
> This allows the printk() output to be flushed to the console.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>

Is bust_spinlocks(1) appropriate for all architectures, or should this
be conditioned on architectures that need oops_in_progress to be set?

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/printk.c  |    5 	3 +	2 -	0 !
>  kernel/rcutree.c |   14 	14 +	0 -	0 !
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/kernel/printk.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -1390,8 +1390,9 @@ static int console_trylock_for_printk(un
>  {
>  	int retval = 0, wake = 0;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> -	int lock = !early_boot_irqs_disabled && !irqs_disabled_flags(flags) &&
> -		(preempt_count() <= 1);
> +	int lock = oops_in_progress || (
> +		!early_boot_irqs_disabled && !irqs_disabled_flags(flags) &&
> +		(preempt_count() <= 1));
>  #else
>  	int lock = 1;
>  #endif
> Index: b/kernel/rcutree.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -758,6 +758,11 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> 
>  	/*
> +	 * Allow printk() to flush to device
> +	 */
> +	bust_spinlocks(1);
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * OK, time to rat on our buddy...
>  	 * See Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt for info on how to debug
>  	 * RCU CPU stall warnings.
> @@ -799,6 +804,8 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct
> 
>  	rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);
> 
> +	bust_spinlocks(0);
> +
>  	force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0);  /* Kick them all. */
>  }
> 
> @@ -808,6 +815,11 @@ static void print_cpu_stall(struct rcu_s
>  	struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
> 
>  	/*
> +	 * Allow printk() to flush to device
> +	 */
> +	bust_spinlocks(1);
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * OK, time to rat on ourselves...
>  	 * See Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt for info on how to debug
>  	 * RCU CPU stall warnings.
> @@ -820,6 +832,8 @@ static void print_cpu_stall(struct rcu_s
>  	if (!trigger_all_cpu_backtrace())
>  		dump_stack();
> 
> +	bust_spinlocks(0);
> +
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
>  	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(jiffies, rsp->jiffies_stall))
>  		rsp->jiffies_stall = jiffies +
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ