[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121210151533.GE6955@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:15:33 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen-blkfront: implement safe version of
llist_for_each_entry
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:15:50PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 07/12/12 21:20, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:21:53PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >> Implement a safe version of llist_for_each_entry, and use it in
> >> blkif_free. Previously grants where freed while iterating the list,
> >> which lead to dereferences when trying to fetch the next item.
> >
> > Looks like xen-blkfront is the only user of this llist_for_each_entry.
> >
> > Would it be more prudent to put the macro in the llist.h file?
>
> I'm not able to find out who is the maintainer of llist, should I just
> CC it's author?
Sure. I CC-ed akpm here to solicit his input as well. Either way I am
OK wit this being in xen-blkfront but it just seems that it could
be useful in the llist file since that is where the non-safe version
resides.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists