[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121210203406.GB21258@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:34:06 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Herton Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -stable 1/1] freezer: PF_FREEZER_NOSIG should be cleared
along with PF_NOFREEZE
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> This patch is only for pre-v3.3 stable trees which backported
> b40a7959 "freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD".
> v3.3+ doesn't need this fix.
>
> b40a7959 is the trivial bugfix, but unfortunately I forgot that
> until 34b087e4 "freezer: kill unused set_freezable_with_signal()"
> there were another only-for-kernel-threads flag, PF_FREEZER_NOSIG,
> which should be cleared as well.
>
> See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/v86d/+bug/1080530
> The freezer fails because it expects that a PF_FREEZER_NOSIG task
> doesn't need a signal. Before b40a7959 it wrongly succeeds leaving
> the PF_NOFREEZE | PF_FREEZER_NOSIG task unfrozen.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # pre v3.3 if commit b40a7959 was taken
>From what I can tell, 3.0-stable didn't take this patch, so it should be
fine. Ben, I don't know about 3.2, you should check this.
Oleg, thanks for doing this work, much appreciated.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists