[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121211084256.E2CDF3E076D@localhost>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:42:56 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, g.liakhovetski@....de,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rob.herring@...xeda.com, thomas.abraham@...aro.org,
t.figa@...sung.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 02/13] of: add a dummy inline function for when CONFIG_OF is not defined
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:41:28 +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com> wrote:
> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
>
> If CONFIG_OF isn't defined, no declaration of of_get_parent will be found
> and compilation can fail. This patch adds a dummy inline function
> definition to fix the problem.
Where is this function getting called when CONFIG_OF is not defined? I
suspect that any code calling of_get_parent() should be CONFIG_OF
specific code and configured out when CONFIG_OF=n, but let me know if
I'm missing something.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists