[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121211085707.8D4F03E076D@localhost>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:57:07 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, g.liakhovetski@....de,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rob.herring@...xeda.com, thomas.abraham@...aro.org,
t.figa@...sung.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 05/13] of: Add empty for_each_available_child_of_node() macro definition
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:41:31 +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com> wrote:
> Add this empty macro definition so users can be compiled without
> excluding this macro call with preprocessor directives when CONFIG_OF
> is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
What non-OF code is calling this function?
g.
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 2fb0dbe..7df42cc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -332,6 +332,9 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
> #define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> while (0)
>
> +#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> + while (0)
> +
> static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
> const struct device_node *node,
> const char *name)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists