linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/12] ARM: ux500: Set correct MMCI regulator voltages in the ux5x0 Device Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFo6KhshYJfSvodPK4e7zC25etz0G8fV4jnAssZX3BDZBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:37:28 +0100
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] ARM: ux500: Set correct MMCI regulator voltages in
 the ux5x0 Device Tree

On 11 December 2012 10:17, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> The voltages for the MMCI GPIO controlled voltage regulation differ
>> depending on who you believe and where you pick the information up
>> from. More recent internal code suggests that the true upper voltage
>> from the shifter is actually v3.3, instead of the previously
>> indicated v2.9. Let's mirror that change in the Device Tree file.

This is wrong. The value should be 2.9V nothing else!

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/