[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121211094812.GA22222@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:48:12 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get_pwm
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:53AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 10:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:57:51AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Okay, if there are no intree users that may be broken, then it should be
> > fine to remove it. In that case you might want to remove the pwm_id
> > field as well instead of deprecating it in this patch.
>
> The reason I marked the pwm_id as deprecated is to signal to out of tree users
> (if any) that they should stop using it since it is going to go away in the
> next cycle.
> If we remove it right away the sdp4030 board file will not going to compile in
> subsystem trees, only in linux-next.
Okay, go ahead then. As long as the field will be removed eventually
that's fine with me.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists