[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXYPPcRZZBFGrqcV--0-UixMH1f+q4WdovErthsLhxn7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:26:08 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>>
>> OK, thanks for the pointers. I actually see more differences between our
>> patchsets. For one example, you seem to have left the parent->ops.bind()
>> stuff in acpi_add_single_object() which calls it even drivers_autoprobe is
>> set.
>
> Sorry, that should have been "which calls it even when drivers_autoprobe is
> not set". I need to be more careful.
>
oh, Jiang Liu had one patch to remove that workaround.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git;a=commitdiff;h=b40dba80c2b8395570d8357e6b3f417c27c84504
ACPI/pci-bind: remove bind/unbind callbacks from acpi_device_ops
Maybe you can review that patches in my for-pci-next2...
those are ACPI related anyway.
those patches have been there for a while, and Bjorn did not have time
to digest them.
or you prefer I resend updated version as huge whole patchset?
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists