[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50C7752C.2000709@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:02:20 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update
ucode on Intel's CPU
On 12/11/2012 09:15 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:00:55AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> ok, then next question is how early it should be.
>>>
>>> before early_cpu_init/early_identify_cpu
>>>
>>> or just before check_bugs/identify_cpu
>>
>> Read the code. It's in x86_64_start_kernel on 64-bit.
>>
>
> No, that is not right place. initrd could be loaded anywhere like way
> high by bootloader.
>
The more I think about it, the more I think the right answer is the one
we have pretty stated all along: if using the 64-bit entry point it is
the responsibility of the boot loader to make sure the kernel, the setup
data, and the initramfs are all mapped on entry.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists