[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACLa4pvLbrCbivWSNTuxROBf5qDNJZmnFVyQaQ=7qcZRtSfcfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:35:26 -0500
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ima: policy search speedup
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The appraisal policy is based on the object metadata, such as the uid,
> so the result is static and can be cached. The measurement policy, on
> the other hand, is normally based on the subject (eg. who is
> reading/executing) the file. Knowledge of whether the file has been
> measured is cached in the iint, but unlike the appraisal policy, not
> whether it needs to be measured. Having the flag on a per inode basis,
> doesn't really help.
Can you try again? Even I can't parse this. Not sure what to tell
you to try again, maybe give us a summary at a high level again and
then why this patch is specifically necessary?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists