linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE9FiQV03xToOaR3NcMtWDv=2MCMYwtY7p97BY3sAC1suYAhNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:42:06 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update
 ucode on Intel's CPU

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 10:02 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>>
>> The more I think about it, the more I think the right answer is the one
>> we have pretty stated all along: if using the 64-bit entry point it is
>> the responsibility of the boot loader to make sure the kernel, the setup
>> data, and the initramfs are all mapped on entry.
>>

arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S::startup_64

is setting up its own page table

>
> This, in turn, brings up another major problem with the 64-bit entry point:
> right now it assumes page tables set up the way the current kernels expect
> them, but the way the kernel expects pages to be laid out on the future is
> almost guaranteed to change.  We need to formalize the expectations of the
> page table layout at 64-bit entry, and check to see what the implications of
> that are.
>
> In particular, we may need to build a set of scaffolding page tables in the
> brk when entered from the 64-bit entry point and switch to them a lot
> sooner.  We wouldn't have to do that when coming from the 16/32-bit entry
> points since we'd control the layout of those page tables.
>
> Oh how fun...

now in for-x86-boot:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git;a=commit;h=8e4e093e6d140f1316953437fdde4e826f5cfd98

it adds extra mapping from the whole kernel when kernel is loaded above 1G.
from round_down(_text, 2M) to round_up(_end -1, 2M).

Do you mean we need to add extra mapping for realmode_data, cmdline,
ramdisk too? (not include setup_data, and it is accessed via
early_ioremap later).

but if the user memmap to exclude some page, we will still need to
relocate the ramdisk.

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/