| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50C6A36C.5030606@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:07:24 +0800
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
CC: <jiang.liu@...wei.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
<laijs@...fujitsu.com>, <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
<yinghai@...nel.org>, <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
<rob@...dley.net>, <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
<minchan.kim@...il.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
<rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, <lliubbo@...il.com>,
<jaegeuk.hanse@...il.com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<glommer@...allels.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] page_alloc: Introduce zone_movable_limit[] to
keep movable limit for nodes
On 2012/12/11 10:33, Tang Chen wrote:
> This patch introduces a new array zone_movable_limit[] to store the
> ZONE_MOVABLE limit from movablecore_map boot option for all nodes.
> The function sanitize_zone_movable_limit() will find out to which
> node the ranges in movable_map.map[] belongs, and calculates the
> low boundary of ZONE_MOVABLE for each node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Lin Feng <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 1c91d16..4853619 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static unsigned long __meminitdata arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[MAX_NR_ZONES];
> static unsigned long __initdata required_kernelcore;
> static unsigned long __initdata required_movablecore;
> static unsigned long __meminitdata zone_movable_pfn[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +static unsigned long __meminitdata zone_movable_limit[MAX_NUMNODES];
>
> /* movable_zone is the "real" zone pages in ZONE_MOVABLE are taken from */
> int movable_zone;
> @@ -4340,6 +4341,77 @@ static unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> return __absent_pages_in_range(nid, zone_start_pfn, zone_end_pfn);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * sanitize_zone_movable_limit - Sanitize the zone_movable_limit array.
> + *
> + * zone_movable_limit is initialized as 0. This function will try to get
> + * the first ZONE_MOVABLE pfn of each node from movablecore_map, and
> + * assigne them to zone_movable_limit.
> + * zone_movable_limit[nid] == 0 means no limit for the node.
> + *
> + * Note: Each range is represented as [start_pfn, end_pfn)
> + */
> +static void __meminit sanitize_zone_movable_limit(void)
> +{
> + int map_pos = 0, i, nid;
> + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> +
> + if (!movablecore_map.nr_map)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Iterate all ranges from minimum to maximum */
> + for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, &nid) {
> + /*
> + * If we have found lowest pfn of ZONE_MOVABLE of the node
> + * specified by user, just go on to check next range.
> + */
> + if (zone_movable_limit[nid])
> + continue;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> + /* Skip DMA memory. */
> + if (start_pfn < arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_DMA])
> + start_pfn = arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_DMA];
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
> + /* Skip DMA32 memory. */
> + if (start_pfn < arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_DMA32])
> + start_pfn = arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[ZONE_DMA32];
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> + /* Skip lowmem if ZONE_MOVABLE is highmem. */
> + if (zone_movable_is_highmem() &&
Hi Tang,
I think zone_movable_is_highmem() is not work correctly here.
sanitize_zone_movable_limit
zone_movable_is_highmem <--using movable_zone here
find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes
find_usable_zone_for_movable <--movable_zone is specified here
I think Jiang Liu's patch works fine for highmem, please refer to:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=135476085816087&w=2
Thanks,
Jianguo Wu
> + start_pfn < arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM])
> + start_pfn = arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM];
> +#endif
> +
> + if (start_pfn >= end_pfn)
> + continue;
> +
> + while (map_pos < movablecore_map.nr_map) {
> + if (end_pfn <= movablecore_map.map[map_pos].start_pfn)
> + break;
> +
> + if (start_pfn >= movablecore_map.map[map_pos].end_pfn) {
> + map_pos++;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The start_pfn of ZONE_MOVABLE is either the minimum
> + * pfn specified by movablecore_map, or 0, which means
> + * the node has no ZONE_MOVABLE.
> + */
> + zone_movable_limit[nid] = max(start_pfn,
> + movablecore_map.map[map_pos].start_pfn);
> +
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
> static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
> unsigned long zone_type,
> @@ -4358,6 +4430,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> return zholes_size[zone_type];
> }
>
> +static void __meminit sanitize_zone_movable_limit(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
>
> static void __meminit calculate_node_totalpages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> @@ -4923,6 +4999,7 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
>
> /* Find the PFNs that ZONE_MOVABLE begins at in each node */
> memset(zone_movable_pfn, 0, sizeof(zone_movable_pfn));
> + sanitize_zone_movable_limit();
> find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes();
>
> /* Print out the zone ranges */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists