[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121211162210.14ddcdc4d37c40520b0fa88a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:22:10 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
include/linux/gfp.h between commit caf491916b1c ("Revert "revert "Revert
"mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD""" and associated damage") from Linus' tree
and commit "mm: add a __GFP_KMEMCG flag" from the akpm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc include/linux/gfp.h
index 31e8041,5520344..0000000
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@@ -30,10 -30,10 +30,11 @@@ struct vm_area_struct
#define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u
#define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u
#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u
-#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x100000u
-#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x200000u
-#define ___GFP_WRITE 0x400000u
-#define ___GFP_KMEMCG 0x800000u
+#define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u
+#define ___GFP_NO_KSWAPD 0x400000u
+#define ___GFP_OTHER_NODE 0x800000u
+#define ___GFP_WRITE 0x1000000u
++#define ___GFP_KMEMCG 0x2000000u
/*
* GFP bitmasks..
@@@ -86,17 -86,16 +87,17 @@@
#define __GFP_RECLAIMABLE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_RECLAIMABLE) /* Page is reclaimable */
#define __GFP_NOTRACK ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NOTRACK) /* Don't track with kmemcheck */
+#define __GFP_NO_KSWAPD ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NO_KSWAPD)
#define __GFP_OTHER_NODE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_OTHER_NODE) /* On behalf of other node */
#define __GFP_WRITE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_WRITE) /* Allocator intends to dirty page */
-
+ #define __GFP_KMEMCG ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_KMEMCG) /* Allocation comes from a memcg-accounted resource */
/*
* This may seem redundant, but it's a way of annotating false positives vs.
* allocations that simply cannot be supported (e.g. page tables).
*/
#define __GFP_NOTRACK_FALSE_POSITIVE (__GFP_NOTRACK)
- #define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 25 /* Room for N __GFP_FOO bits */
-#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 24 /* Room for N __GFP_FOO bits */
++#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 26 /* Room for N __GFP_FOO bits */
#define __GFP_BITS_MASK ((__force gfp_t)((1 << __GFP_BITS_SHIFT) - 1))
/* This equals 0, but use constants in case they ever change */
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists