lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:44:00 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: rt: fix selecting runqueue for task to be pushed

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 20:54 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> I'm actually thinking that that test should always fail. The
>> cpupri_find() does a scan of all priorities up to but not including the
>> current task's priority. If cpupri_find() finds a mask, it means that it
>> found CPUs that are running only tasks of lower priority than the task
>> we are checking. Which means, it should never include the task's CPU, as
>> that CPU should have a higher priority than what is being returned by
>> lowest_mask. If it can't find a set of CPUs of lower priority, it should
>> return false, and the find_lowest_rq() should exit.
>>
>> I'll add a WARN_ON_ONCE() there, and see if I can trigger it. :-/
>
> Ah, for select_task_rq_rt() it can get that CPU, because it's called in
> the wakeup path before the task is added into the CPUs priority. And we
> definitely want the current CPU in that case.
>
Hm ... the latency of the woken task increases iff we overload its
runqueue, no?

Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ