lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:33:29 +0530
From:	Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@...il.com>
To:	Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS5: Support Exynos5-bus devfreq driver

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi Abhilash Kesavan.
Hi Mr Choi,

Thanks for your comments.
>
>
>> +     /* Change Divider - LEX */
>> +     tmp = __raw_readl(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_LEX);
>> +
>> +     tmp &= ~(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_LEX_ATCLK_LEX_MASK |
>> +             EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_LEX_PCLK_LEX_MASK);
>> +
>> +     tmp |= int_freq[div_index].clk_div_lex;
>> +
>> +     __raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_LEX);
>> +
>
> I knew that only ATCLK_LEX & PCLK_LEX divider value are in CLKDIV_LEX
> register. (Others are reserved and value is 0)
> So, I think
> "
> tmp = int_freq[div_index].clk_div_lex;
> __raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_LEX);
> "
> Is enough.
>
>> +     tmp = __raw_readl(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_LEX);
>> +
>> +     tmp &= ~(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_LEX_ATCLK_LEX_MASK |
>> +             EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_LEX_PCLK_LEX_MASK);
> -> not need.
>
>
>
>> +     while (__raw_readl(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_STAT_LEX) & 0x110)
>> +             cpu_relax();
>> +
>> +     /* Change Divider - R0X */
>> +     tmp = __raw_readl(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_R0X);
>> +
>> +     tmp &= ~EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_R0X_PCLK_R0X_MASK;
>> +
>> +     tmp |= int_freq[div_index].clk_div_r0x;
>> +
>> +     __raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_R0X);
>> +
>
> Same here
>
>
>> +     while (__raw_readl(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_STAT_R0X) & 0x10)
>> +             cpu_relax();
>> +
>> +     /* Change Divider - R1X */
>> +     tmp = __raw_readl(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_R1X);
>> +
>> +     tmp &= ~EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_R1X_PCLK_R1X_MASK;
>> +
>> +     tmp |= int_freq[div_index].clk_div_r1x;
>> +
>> +     __raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_R1X);
>> +
>
> Same here
>
>> +     while (__raw_readl(EXYNOS5_CLKDIV_STAT_R1X) & 0x10)
>> +             cpu_relax();
>
> How about your opinion?
I have verified the registers against the 5250 User Manual. You are
right on all counts.
I will fix them all and re-post.
>
> thanks
Regards,
Abhilash
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ