linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] enable support for AMBA drivers under x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:37:58 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Davide Ciminaghi <ciminaghi@...dd.com>
CC:	jaswinder.singh@...aro.org, will.deacon@....com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	djbw@...com, vinod.koul@...el.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, rubini@...dd.com, wim@...ana.be,
	cjb@...top.org, davidb@...eaurora.org, nico@...xnic.net,
	ben-linux@...ff.org, viresh.linux@...il.com,
	rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, giancarlo.asnaghi@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] enable support for AMBA drivers under x86

OK, so I'm not 100% sure how to best handle this patchset.  I can carry 
it in the x86 tree with the appropriate ACKs... which could lead to ugly 
merge conflicts, or we can ask the respective driver authors to take 
their bits... but that gives a sequencing problem (the core patchset 
depends on a bunch of outside trees in order to be tested.)

Either way it is a late pull for 3.8 at best... however, the risk seems 
low so *maybe* that is acceptable.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/