[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1355378190.1567.6.camel@kernel.cn.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:56:30 -0600
From: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] mm: vmscan: disregard swappiness shortly before
going OOM
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 16:43 -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> When a reclaim scanner is doing its final scan before giving up and
> there is swap space available, pay no attention to swappiness
> preference anymore. Just swap.
>
Confuse! If it's final scan and still swap space available, why nr[lru]
= div64_u64(scan * fraction[file], denominator); instead of nr[lru] =
scan; ?
> Note that this change won't make too big of a difference for general
> reclaim: anonymous pages are already force-scanned when there is only
> very little file cache left, and there very likely isn't when the
> reclaimer enters this final cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 3874dcb..6e53446 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1751,7 +1751,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
> unsigned long scan;
>
> scan = get_lru_size(lruvec, lru);
> - if (sc->priority || noswap || !vmscan_swappiness(sc)) {
> + if (sc->priority || noswap) {
> scan >>= sc->priority;
> if (!scan && force_scan)
> scan = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists